这个在geocaching.com上的发布未能通过审核,原因是geocaching准备不发布virtual的cache了,可能是发布virtual的人太多,不想把geocaching变成POI的数据库。一定要vitual的话,也要放一个可以写log的纸。
不过我觉得大家还是可以到这个点去看一下。
具体拒绝理由如下:
August 29 by erik88l-r (1298 found)
Thanks for your cache submission,
However, please see (
visit link)
Since late March of 2003 the site has stopped posting sites as virtual caches where one could either place a physical cache or use the site as the basis for an offset or multistage hunt leading to a physical cache. Geocaching.com is striving to return to its roots of posting caches, not becoming a database of points of interest. The link also details the fact that graves, monuments, historic plaques, etc. are generally too common to be considered.
The location you describe sounds like a good goal for a cache hunt, but please place a micro cache there, or use info found there to lead a finder to a physical cache to be found elsewhere.
That would allow people to visit your special site, but have a traditional cache to log as well.
Often a micro cache can be readily placed at or near the same spot submitted as a virtual cache. That is usually the case unless the spot is in the middle of a busy city.
Here are some excellent ideas for micro caches that could be hidden virtually anywhere, some even in the middle of a busy city.
(
visit link) (
visit link) (
visit link) (
visit link) (
visit link) (
visit link) (
visit link) (
visit link) (
visit link) (
visit link) (
visit link) (
visit link) (
visit link)
Or.... as an alternative just wait until the new "sister" site to geocaching.com is ready. This is being done to accomodate locationless and virtual caches of the type you've submitted. The site is currently only visible to premium members at www.waymarking.com
Thank you for your understanding,
erik - geocaching.com admin